Health Education, Gingivitis

Although the current study investigated several criteria outside the level analysis and smog readability measures, classifying a publication of readability remains a challenge, and there are many postulates a very readable document this study did not examine. Some other parameters to assess might include the use of bright colors for highlighting important and advantageous use of white space (so the page appears less dense with text). A second limitation of this study is the subjective selection of dental jargon and difficult words in the text frame. It should be noted, however, that many of them were the words of Alexander had considered difficult to readability study.

A third consideration is the selection of the brochures. The materials for this study were selected on the basis of their availability, simulating how to achieve the publications could be a dentist or health care provider orally in finding materials for their patients. The price is a drawback of providing literature to patients, and because the authors of this study received samples of the materials for free, either because the brochure is free or a sample can be downloaded, although the availability, cost, not, was the main selection criteria in the review of publications. Viewing these publications with fees attached is easily done by visiting a website. In this sense, the materials can be pre-selection before a supplier chooses to buy them. Health Education, Gingivitis